Vakalat

For advocates and chambers in India

Every hearing.
Every court.
One board.

Your matters, your dates and your files in one place — built around the thing that actually runs a litigating practice: what you are listed for tomorrow, and in whose court.

Sign in with GoogleHow to use itSee what it does

Access is by invitation while we build. Your files stay on Indian infrastructure.

The boardevery hearing, every court
7 listed
Today3
  • Mon
    14
    Sep
    10:30
    item 7

    Ramesh Iyer vs Sundaram Finance Ltd.

    for Pet.
    C.S. 2345/2024City Civil Court, MumbaiSri A. R. Deshmukh
    Framing of issuesMHAU010023452024
  • Mon
    14
    Sep
    11:15
    item 12

    State of Maharashtra vs Nitin Kulkarni

    for Resp.
    Crl.M.A. 1189/2023Sessions Court, MumbaiSmt. P. Rajagopal
    Bail — BNS 318(4)MHAU020011892023
  • Mon
    14
    Sep
    14:00
    item 31

    Anjali Rao vs Bharat Housing Society

    for Pet.
    S.C.C. 7811/2025Small Causes Court, MumbaiSri K. Venkatesh
    Evidence — PW-2MHAU010078112025
Tomorrow2
  • Tue
    15
    Sep
    11:00
    item 4

    Sunil Deshpande vs Municipal Corp. of Gr. Mumbai

    for Pet.
    W.P. 447/2024Bombay High CourtHon'ble Justice S. Nair
    Final hearingMHHC030004472024
  • Tue
    15
    Sep
    10:00
    item 19

    Kaveri Traders vs Prakash Enterprises

    for Pet.
    N.I. 3219/2024Metropolitan Magistrate, AndheriSmt. R. Fernandes
    S.138 N.I. Act — pleaMHAU040032192024
This week2
  • Fri
    18
    Sep
    12:30
    item 9

    Lata Pawar vs Oriental Insurance Co.

    for Pet.
    M.A. 5670/2025Motor Accident Claims TribunalSri D. Bhatt
    Compensation — argumentsMHAU010056702025
  • Fri
    18
    Sep
    15:45
    item 27

    Zenith Infra Pvt. Ltd. vs State Bank of India

    for Resp.
    A.O. 998/2025Bombay High CourtHon'ble Justice M. Kapoor
    AdmissionMHHC030009982025

Illustrative board. Party names are invented; CNRs follow the real 16-character shape but are not live cases.

What it does

Four things, done properly

The board

One agenda across every courtroom

Your day, time-ordered, with the item number, the courtroom, the judge and what the matter is listed for. Subscribe it to your phone calendar and it travels with you.

Dates

Hearing history that cannot be overwritten

Every adjournment is recorded as a new entry, never an edit. So "when did this date move, and who was told" is always a question with an answer.

Files

Scan from your phone, search the text

Camera capture with edge detection, OCR to a searchable PDF, versioned against the matter. Print a brief straight to AirPrint from the same screen.

Clients

A portal that answers the phone call for you

Your client signs in with an OTP and sees their own timeline — past hearings, orders, next date. Invitation only, and only what you mark visible.

Inside

A matter, and an assistant that says no

Hearings are recorded, never overwritten — so an adjournment leaves a trail instead of erasing one. And the assistant answers only from your files and the section map, because a model asked about Indian criminal law will otherwise cite an IPC section repealed in 2024.

vakalat.trendriders.tech/matters/…

2026/014 · for Petitioner

Ramesh Iyer vs Sundaram Finance Ltd.

Hearing log — append-only, so an adjournment never overwrites history

  1. 2026-09-10Framing of issues · item 7
  2. 2026-08-04Written statement filed · item 12
  3. 2026-06-19Adjourned — counsel engaged · item 3
  4. 2026-05-02Summons served · item 19
vakalat.trendriders.tech/assistant
What replaced IPC 420?Ask

Sources it is allowed to use

[1] IPC 420 → BNS 318unverified
Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property.

Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property is now BNS s.318, which replaced IPC s.420 [1].

Ask it something it has no source for and it refuses — rather than citing a repealed section as if it were current.

Built around Rule 36

A practice tool, not a listing site

Advocates cannot solicit work, and the Bar Council has acted against platforms that rank, rate or broker. So Vakalat has no directory, no ratings, no leads and no client-side signup — by design, not by policy.

  • Your firm page carries the Schedule fields only

    Name, enrolment, bar council, qualifications, areas of practice. There is nowhere to type a testimonial, because the field does not exist.

  • Clients arrive by your invitation

    There is no public signup. A client account exists only because your chamber created it.

  • Nobody is ranked against anybody

    No ratings, no ordering, no "top advocate". The platform never introduces a stranger to counsel.