Vakalat

For advocates and chambers in India

Every hearing.
Every court.
One board.

Your matters, your dates and your files in one place — built around the thing that actually runs a litigating practice: what you are listed for tomorrow, and in whose court.

Sign in with GoogleSee what it does

Access is by invitation while we build. Your files stay on Indian infrastructure.

The boardevery hearing, every court
7 listed
Today3
  • 10:30
    item 7

    Ramesh Iyer vs Sundaram Finance Ltd.

    for Pet.
    C.S. 2345/2024Court 14, City Civil Court, MumbaiSri A. R. Deshmukh
    Framing of issuesMHAU010023452024Cause list
  • 11:15
    item 12

    State of Maharashtra vs Nitin Kulkarni

    for Resp.
    Crl.M.A. 1189/2023Court 3, Sessions Court, MumbaiSmt. P. Rajagopal
    Bail — BNS 318(4)MHAU020011892023Court syncbriefed to Adv. Meera Shah
  • 14:00
    item 31

    Anjali Rao vs Bharat Housing Society

    for Pet.
    S.C.C. 7811/2025Court 8, Small Causes Court, MumbaiSri K. Venkatesh
    Evidence — PW-2MHAU010078112025Cause list
Tomorrow2
  • 11:00
    item 4

    Sunil Deshpande vs Municipal Corp. of Gr. Mumbai

    for Pet.
    W.P. 447/2024Court 22, Bombay High CourtHon'ble Justice S. Nair
    Final hearingMHHC030004472024Court sync
  • 10:00
    item 19

    Kaveri Traders vs Prakash Enterprises

    for Pet.
    N.I. 3219/2024Court 5, Metropolitan Magistrate, AndheriSmt. R. Fernandes
    S.138 N.I. Act — pleaMHAU040032192024Cause listbriefed to Adv. Vikram Joshi
This week2
  • 12:30
    item 9

    Lata Pawar vs Oriental Insurance Co.

    for Pet.
    M.A. 5670/2025Court 2, Motor Accident Claims TribunalSri D. Bhatt
    Compensation — argumentsMHAU010056702025Entered
  • 15:45
    item 27

    Zenith Infra Pvt. Ltd. vs State Bank of India

    for Resp.
    A.O. 998/2025Court 16, Bombay High CourtHon'ble Justice M. Kapoor
    AdmissionMHHC030009982025Court syncbriefed to Adv. Meera Shah

Illustrative board. Party names are invented; CNRs follow the real 16-character shape but are not live cases.

What it does

Four things, done properly

The board

One agenda across every courtroom

Your day, time-ordered, with the item number, the courtroom, the judge and what the matter is listed for. Subscribe it to your phone calendar and it travels with you.

Dates

Hearing history that cannot be overwritten

Every adjournment is recorded as a new entry, never an edit. So "when did this date move, and who was told" is always a question with an answer.

Files

Scan from your phone, search the text

Camera capture with edge detection, OCR to a searchable PDF, versioned against the matter. Print a brief straight to AirPrint from the same screen.

Clients

A portal that answers the phone call for you

Your client signs in with an OTP and sees their own timeline — past hearings, orders, next date. Invitation only, and only what you mark visible.

Built around Rule 36

A practice tool, not a listing site

Advocates cannot solicit work, and the Bar Council has acted against platforms that rank, rate or broker. So Vakalat has no directory, no ratings, no leads and no client-side signup — by design, not by policy.

  • Your firm page carries the Schedule fields only

    Name, enrolment, bar council, qualifications, areas of practice. There is nowhere to type a testimonial, because the field does not exist.

  • Clients arrive by your invitation

    There is no public signup. A client account exists only because your chamber created it.

  • Nobody is ranked against anybody

    No ratings, no ordering, no "top advocate". The platform never introduces a stranger to counsel.